Issue Spotting and Strategy with Dash Cams and Civil Lawsuits in Texas
Dash cameras were once mostly used by law enforcement and commercial truck drivers, but today they are a common accessory in many personal vehicles. With affordable and accessible technology, it’s not unusual to see a dash cam mounted on a windshield or dashboard recording every moment on the road. As the trend continues, it’s important to understand the legal implications for Texans, especially concerning personal injury cases in civil court.
Whether you are an attorney preparing for trial or a cautious driver wanting to document your time on the road, dash cams can offer significant advantages. At the same time, they come with risks that must be carefully weighed. Understanding how Texas law treats dash cam footage in court can help avoid unintended consequences.
You Might Also Like – Lawyers in Uniform: Military Service Beyond the Courtroom | Power 5 – Ep. 14
Check out Attorney Joe I. Zaid in Pasadena, Texas. Listen to Joe Zaid on Texas Law Talk Radio, focusing on Accident Victims and Common Personal Injury Matters
Dash Cam Footage as Evidence in Texas
Texas courts allow dash cam footage to be introduced as evidence if it meets certain legal standards. The video must be relevant to the case, authentic, and not unfairly prejudice either party. When these criteria are met, dashcam footage can be a powerful tool in clarifying the facts and establishing liability.
For example, if a driver is accused of running a red light or making an illegal turn, dash cam footage may provide clear visual evidence. This can be crucial when witness accounts differ or when a party denies wrongdoing. In many cases, video from a dashcam can speak louder than words.
However, attorneys must take care to lay a proper foundation for the footage. The person presenting the evidence must explain when, where, and how the footage was recorded and demonstrate that it accurately reflects what occurred. Failing to meet these requirements can result in the footage being excluded from the case.
Opening the Door: What Else Might the Jury See?
One major issue to consider is what happens when a party introduces dashcam footage. Offering part of the footage may allow the other side to request that the rest of the recording be shown as well. This is based on the legal principle of optional completeness under Texas Rule of Evidence 106.
For example, if a plaintiff introduces thirty seconds of footage showing a collision, the defense may argue that the two minutes leading up to the crash are also relevant. If that earlier footage shows the plaintiff speeding, weaving through traffic, or behaving aggressively, it could influence how the jury allocates fault. Even if that behavior didn’t directly cause the crash, it could damage the plaintiff’s credibility.
This is where the risk of offering dashcam footage becomes more apparent. By showing only a portion of the recording, a party may inadvertently invite scrutiny of the entire event. In some cases, this could turn a strong piece of evidence into a liability.
How Much Can the Jury Watch?
Texas judges have the discretion to determine how much footage the jury will be allowed to see. If the video is overly long or contains irrelevant portions, the judge may limit it to just the moments immediately surrounding the incident. On the other hand, if the additional footage provides important context, the jury may be permitted to view more than expected.
When deciding whether to admit more of the footage, judges will consider whether doing so helps the jury understand the situation more fully. They also balance the value of the evidence against any potential unfairness to either party. In practice, this means that even small details captured on camera can end up being reviewed and discussed in court.
Lawyers must prepare for the possibility that the footage they introduce could open the door to much more being seen. This makes it essential to review the entire recording and assess whether it helps or hurts the case overall. Being selective without considering the consequences can backfire.
Pros of Using Dash Cams
Dash cams provide objective documentation of what happens on the road. The video recording can serve as an unbiased “silent witness,” capturing moments that may be contested by the parties involved. This can reduce reliance on conflicting witness testimony and help resolve disputes based on actual events.
In many cases, clear footage may encourage quicker settlements. When insurance adjusters or opposing counsel see irrefutable video evidence, they may be more willing to resolve the matter efficiently. This can save everyone involved time and money.
Dash cams also offer protection against fraudulent claims. If someone stages an accident or provides false information about how a crash occurred, dash cam footage can set the record straight. This adds a layer of security for drivers and legal professionals alike.
Some insurance companies may offer discounts to policyholders who use dash cams. They see the potential value in having accurate records of traffic incidents. For clients and consumers, this can be an added incentive to install the device.
Cons and Legal Risks
Dash cams can raise privacy concerns when they capture audio and video of passengers, pedestrians, or other drivers. Depending on how and where the footage is recorded, there may be questions about whether consent was given or if any privacy laws were violated. These concerns could become issues in court or public discussion.
The footage recorded by your dash cam could be used against you. If you were speeding, texting, or committing a traffic violation at the time of the crash, the video could serve as evidence of your fault. Even if you were not entirely responsible for the incident, the footage might reduce your chance of receiving full compensation.
Another issue is data retention. Many dashcams record on a loop and automatically overwrite old footage, which can lead to key evidence being lost. If one party later claims the loss of video amounts to the destruction of evidence, a court may draw negative inferences.
Offering a portion of dashcam footage may invite opposing counsel to demand access to the entire recording. This can result in revealing conduct that may not be directly related to the crash but still negatively influences the jury’s opinion. The party that first introduced the footage may regret opening that door.
Best Practices for Attorneys and Drivers
Anyone planning to introduce dashcam footage in court should review the entire video beforehand. It’s important to know exactly what the footage shows and whether it could damage the case. Being prepared for how the opposing party might use it is critical to a good trial strategy.
Preserving the evidence is also essential. Once an accident occurs, the footage should be backed up and stored securely to avoid claims that important video was lost or destroyed. Notifying opposing counsel that video exists is also a good practice in maintaining transparency.
Attorneys should educate clients on the potential risks of dash cams as well as the benefits. While the technology can be helpful, it is not always favorable in every case. Understanding the full implications before using video evidence can help prevent costly mistakes.
Survey Says: A Powerful Tool with Caveats
Dash cam footage can be a powerful asset in Texas personal injury cases, offering clear documentation that may prove critical to a case’s outcome. However, it can also expose more than a party intends and may affect how a jury views the facts. Being strategic, informed, and cautious with this technology is the best way to use it effectively in both everyday driving and the courtroom.
Need Content Marketing? Use Lone Star Content Marketing!
Affordable Monthly Plans with a complete array of Marketing, Branding, and Copywriting Services.